Utilising organs from hepatitis C virus PCR-positive donors in Western Australia.

We transplanted six solid organs from three hepatitis C virus (HCV) polymerase chain reaction (PCR)-positive donors during 2018-2023. Recipients were treated with glecaprevir/pibrentasvir or sofosbuvir/velpatasvir for 4-12 weeks, with all six achieving sustained virological response without significant adverse events. As occurs in other jurisdictions, solid organ transplants from HCR PCR-positive donors can be safely utilised in Australia.

Comparison of Glecaprevir/Pibrentasvir and Sofosbuvir/Ledipasvir in Patients with Hepatitis C Virus Genotype 1 and 2 in South Korea.

Background/Aims: This study compared the effectiveness and safety of glecaprevir/pibrentasvir (GLE/PIB) and sofosbuvir/ledipasvir (SOF/LDV) in real-life clinical practice. Methods: The data from genotype 1 or 2 chronic hepatitis C patients treated with GLE/PIB or sofosbuvir + ribavirin or SOF/LDV in South Korea were collected retrospectively. The analysis included the treatment completion rate, sustained virologic response at 12 weeks (SVR12) test rate, treatment effectiveness, and adverse events. Results: Seven hundred and eighty-two patients with genotype 1 or 2 chronic hepatitis C who were treated with GLE/PIB (n=575) or SOF/LDV (n=207) were included in this retrospective study. The baseline demographic and clinical characteristics revealed significant statistical differences in age, genotype, ascites, liver cirrhosis, and hepatocellular carcinoma between the GLE/PIB and SOF/LDV groups. Twenty-two patients did not complete the treatment protocol. The treatment completion rate was high for both regimens without statistical significance (97.7% vs. 95.7%, p=0.08). The overall SVR12 of intention-to-treat analysis was 81.2% vs. 80.7% without statistical significance (p=0.87). The overall SVR12 of per protocol analysis was 98.7% vs. 100% without statistical significance (p=0.14). Six patients treated with GLE/PIB experienced treatment failure. They were all male, genotype 2, and showed a negative hepatitis C virus RNA level at the end of treatment. Two patients treated with GLE/PIB stopped medication because of fever and abdominal discomfort. Conclusions: Both regimens had similar treatment completion rates, effectiveness, and safety profiles. Therefore, the SOF/LDV regimen can also be considered a viable DAA for the treatment of patients with genotype 1 or 2 chronic hepatitis C.

ESPGHAN recommendations on treatment of chronic hepatitis C virus infection in adolescents and children including those living in resource-limited settings.

Hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection is a major cause of chronic liver disease worldwide, with more than three million viraemic adolescents and children. Treatment of adults with HCV infection and HCV-related liver disease has advanced considerably thanks to development and improvements in therapy. Direct-acting antiviral regimens are safe and effective. Three regimens with pangenotypic activity (glecaprevir/pibrentasvir, sofosbuvir/velpatasvir and sofosbuvir/velpatasvir/voxilaprevir) and three regimens with genotype-specific activity (sofosbuvir/ribavirin, sofosbuvir/ledipasvir and elbasvir/grazoprevir) have been approved with age-specific limitation for treatment of children with chronic hepatitis C by the European Medicines Agency and the United States Food and Drug Administration. The World Health Organization has set the ambitious target to eliminate hepatitis C as a major public health threat by 2030 and based its actions against HCV on the large use of direct acting antivirals. These updated European Society for Pediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition recommendations on treatment of hepatitis C describe the optimal therapeutic management of adolescents and children with HCV infection including specific indications for those living in resource-limited settings.

Using HCV-viremic organs for lung transplantation does not confer higher rejection rates compared to HCV-negative organs.

BACKGROUND: National data demonstrate that hepatitis C virus (HCV)-infected organ donors are increasingly being used in the US, including for lung transplantation. We aimed to assess whether there were any differences in the acute or chronic rejection rates at 1 year following lung transplantation from HCV-viremic versus uninfected donors. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed all lung transplant recipients at our institution from April 1, 2017 to October 1, 2020 and then assessed various outcomes between those who received a transplant from HCV-viremic donors versus HCV-negative donors. Primary outcome was to determine if there was a higher incidence of acute and/or chronic allograft rejection when using HCV NAT+ lung donation. We carried out univariate and multivariate analyses. RESULTS: We transplanted 135 patients during the study period, including 18 from HCV-viremic donors. Standard induction therapy with basiliximab and maintenance triple drug immunosuppression was utilized per UC San Diego protocol. All 17 patients receiving HCV-viremic organs developed acute HCV infection and were treated in the postoperative period with 12 weeks of direct acting antivirals (DAA). HCV genotypes included 1, 2, and 3. DAA used included glecaprevir/pibrentasvir (12), sofosbuvir/velpatasvir (1), and ledipasvir/sofosbuvir (2) with drug choice determined by patient's medical insurance coverage. Sustained virological response at 12 weeks after end of DAA therapy (SVR12), indicative of a cure, was achieved in all (100%) recipients. No recipient had a serious adverse event related to HCV infection. The lung transplant recipient (LTR) HCV-viremic donors had lower rates of clinically significant rejection (5.9% vs. 11% LTR HCV-nonviremic donors), and no chronic lung allograft dysfunction at 1 year (vs. 5.9% LTR HCV-nonviremic donors). One-year survival was 100% in the LTR HCV-viremic donors compared to 95.8% in the LTR HCV-nonviremic donors. CONCLUSIONS: We demonstrate the feasibility and success of using HCV NAT + donors with excellent results and without a higher incidence of rejection. Longer term follow-up and a larger sample size are needed to allow this to be a more widely accepted practice for lung transplant programs and payors.

Treatment of the most difficult-to-cure hepatitis C virus-infected population with sofosbuvir / velpatasvir.

INTRODUCTION: Pangenotypic therapies for infections with hepatitis C virus (HCV), although universal and highly effective, entail a risk of treatment failure. OBJECTIVES: Our study aimed to identify the population of HCV­infected patients most difficult to cure with the sofosbuvir / velpatasvir (SOF/VEL) regimen. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The effectiveness of the SOF/VEL regimen with a possible addition of ribavirin (RBV) was evaluated in populations known to be less responsive to treatment, and then in a population characterized by the combination of all factors impairing effectiveness, comprising patients treated with this regimen in the EpiTer­2 multicenter retrospective study. RESULTS: A total of 2267 patients were treated with SOF/VEL±RBV. Of those, 2078 (96.4%) achieved sustained virologic response. The cure rate was 93.5% among 646 patients infected with genotype (GT) 3, 92.3% among 635 patients with cirrhosis, 95.5% in a population of 1233 men, and 94.1% among 421 patients with body mass index (BMI) above 30. An analysis in a group of 43 men with cirrhosis and obesity infected with GT3 showed the effectiveness of pangenotypic therapy at only 79.1%, falling to 66.7% in individuals with previous treatment failure. CONCLUSIONS: In a large population of SOF/VEL­treated HCV­infected patients, we showed relatively low effectiveness of the regimen in treatment­experienced men with cirrhosis and obesity, infected with GT3. Triple therapy should be considered when initiating the treatment of HCV infections in this group, which, however, needs to be confirmed in further studies. Previous studies were conducted in less demanding populations, because they did not take into account sex and BMI, which significantly affect the treatment effectiveness.

An algorithm for simplified hepatitis C virus treatment with non-specialist care based on nation-wide data from Taiwan.

BACKGROUND: Both European Association for the Study of the Liver (EASL) and American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases and the Infectious Diseases Society of America (AASLD-IDSA) guidelines recommend simplified hepatitis C virus (HCV) treatment with pan-genotypic sofosbuvir/velpatasvir or glecaprevir/pibrentasvir for eligible patients. This observational study used real-world data to assess these regimens' safety in eligible patients and develop an algorithm to identify patients suitable for simplified treatment by non-specialists. METHODS: 7,677 HCV-infected patients from Taiwan Hepatitis C Registry (TACR) who received at least one dose of sofosbuvir/velpatasvir or glecaprevir/pibrentasvir, and fulfilled the EASL/AASLD-IDSA criteria for simplified treatment were analyzed. Multivariate analysis was conducted on patient characteristics and safety data. RESULTS: Overall, 92.8% (7,128/7,677) of patients achieved sustained virological response and only 1.9% (146/7,677) experienced Grades 2-4 laboratory abnormalities in key liver function parameters (alanine aminotransferase, aspartate aminotransferase, and total bilirubin), with only 18 patients (0.23%) experiencing Grades 3-4 abnormalities. Age > 70 years old, presence of hepatocellular carcinoma, total bilirubin > 1.2 mg/dL, estimated glomerular filtration rate < 60 mL/min/1.73 m2, and Fibrosis-4 > 3.25 were associated with higher risks of Grades 2-4 abnormalities. Patients with any of these had an odds of 4.53 times than that of those without in developing Grades 2-4 abnormalities (p < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Real-world data from Taiwan confirmed that simplified HCV treatment for eligible patients with pan-genotypic regimens is effective and well tolerated. The TACR algorithm, developed based on this study's results, can further identify patients who can be safely managed by non-specialist care.

Bemnifosbuvir (BEM, AT-527), a novel nucleotide analogue inhibitor of the hepatitis C virus NS5B polymerase.

INTRODUCTION: Chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) persists as a public health concern worldwide. Consequently, optimizing HCV therapy remains an important objective. While current therapies are generally highly effective, advanced antiviral agents are needed to maximize cure rates with potentially shorter treatment durations in a broader patient population, particularly those patients with advanced diseases who remain difficult to treat. AREAS COVERED: This review summarizes the in vitro anti-HCV activity, preclinical pharmacological properties of bemnifosbuvir (BEM, AT-527), a novel prodrug that is metabolically converted to AT-9010, the active guanosine triphosphate analogue that potently and selectively inhibits several viral RNA polymerases, including the HCV NS5B polymerase. Results from clinical proof-of-concept and phase 2 combination studies are also discussed. EXPERT OPINION: BEM exhibits potent pan-genotype activity against HCV, and has favorable safety, and drug interaction profiles. BEM is approximately 10-fold more potent than sofosbuvir against HCV genotypes (GT) tested in vitro. When combined with a potent NS5A inhibitor, BEM is expected to be a promising once-daily oral antiviral for chronic HCV infection of all genotypes and fibrosis stages with potentially short treatment durations.

Serum MicroRNA profiles in chronic hepatitis C Egyptian patients before and after combined sofosbuvir and daclatasvir treatment.

BACKGROUND: MicroRNAs (miR) are small sequence of nucleotides that can affect multiple genes involved in the hepatitis C virus (HCV) life cycle and disease development. The purpose of the present study was to investigate the clinical significance of serum microRNA profiles in a cohort of Egyptian patients with chronic HCV infection before and after combined sofosbuvir and daclatasvir treatment, as well as to gain a better understanding of the exact interaction mechanism in HCV transcriptional activity via differentially expressed miRNAs. For 12 weeks, 50 patients were eligible for and received sofosbuvir (400 mg daily) and daclatasvir (60 mg daily) treatment. Each patient's blood was obtained twice: once before therapy began and again three months afterwards. RESULTS: The current study found that serum levels of circulating miR-122, miR-221, miR-23a, miR-125, miR-217, miR-224, and miR-181a were high in HCV pre-treatment patients, but after 12 weeks of direct-acting antiviral (DAAs) treatment, there was a statistically significant reduction in expression levels of miR-122, miR-221, miR-23a, miR-125, miR-217, and miR-224 (p < 0.001). There is no statistical significance for miR-181a. CONCLUSION: The key differentially expressed microRNAs before and after the direct-acting antiviral (DAA) regimen were connected to the dynamics of chronic HCV infection, suggesting their potential as predictive biomarkers for HCV clearance after sofosbuvir and daclatasvir therapy.

Efficacy and safety of DAA in children and adolescents with chronic HCV infection: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: We evaluated the effectiveness and safety of pan-genotypic regimens, glecaprevir/pibrentasvir (GLE/PIB), sofosbuvir/velpatasvir (SOF/VEL), and sofosbuvir/daclatasvir (SOF/DCV) and other direct-acting antivirals (DAA) regimens for the treatment of hepatitis C virus (HCV)-infected adolescents (12-18 years), older children (6-11 years), and young children (3-5 years). The purpose of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to inform the World Health Organization (WHO) guidelines. METHODS: We included clinical trials and observational studies published up to August 11, 2021, that evaluated DAA regimens in HCV-infected adolescents, older children, and young children. We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, and CENTRAL databases and key conference abstracts. Sustained virological response 12 weeks after the end of treatment (SVR12), adverse events (AEs), and treatment discontinuation were the outcomes evaluated. Risk of bias was assessed using a modified version of the ROBINS-I tool. Data were pooled using random-effects models, and certainty of the evidence was assessed using the GRADE approach. RESULTS: A total of 49 studies including 1882 adolescents, 436 older children, and 166 young children were considered. The SVR12 was 100% (95% Confidence Interval: 96-100), 96% (90-100), and 96% (83-100) for GLE/PIB in adolescents, older, and young children, respectively; 95% (90-99), 93% (86-98), and 83% (70-93), for SOF/VEL, respectively; and 100% (97-100) and 100% (94-100) for SOF/DCV in adolescent and older children, respectively. There was a clear trend towards a higher rate of any reported AE from adolescents (50%), older children (53%), to young children (72%). Serious AEs and treatment discontinuations were uncommon in adolescents and older children (<1%) but slightly higher in young children (3%). CONCLUSIONS: All three pan-genotypic DAA regimens were highly effective and well-tolerated and are now recommended by the WHO for use in adults, adolescents, and children down to 3 years, which will simplify procurement and supply chain management. The evidence was based largely on single-arm non-randomized controlled studies. Moreover, there were also missing data regarding key variables such as route of HCV acquisition, presence or absence of cirrhosis, or HIV co-infection that precluded evaluation of the impact of these factors on outcomes. PROSPERO RECORD: CRD42020146752.

Successful prolonged treatment with sofosbuvir/velpatasvir for a hepatitis C patient with decompensated cirrhosis and treatment failure after 12-week therapy.

There is no established rescue therapy for hepatitis C patients with decompensated cirrhosis who experience treatment failure on 12-week sofosbuvir (SOF)/velpatasvir (VEL) therapy that is the only approved regimen for decompensated cirrhosis in Japan. We experienced a patient with decompensated cirrhosis who showed virologic relapse at post-treatment week 7 following 12-week SOF/VEL therapy. She had resistance-associated substitutions (RASs) against VEL before therapy but did not achieve new RASs against VEL or SOF after therapy. We considered rescue therapy following strong demand from her and her family. The drug adherence of therapy was 100%, and the treatment was well tolerated. Because we prioritized the safety and drug adherence of the regimen, we performed prolonged 24-week SOF/VEL therapy without ribavirin at her own expense with the approval of the ethics board in the hospital where the first author belongs. Fortunately, a sustained virologic response 24 was achieved without any adverse events. Hepatocellular carcinoma that had developed after 12-week SOF/VEL therapy recurred and was treated near the end of rescue therapy, but hepatic functional reserve improved. Although this was a single case report and was assumed to be very rare, the same regimen might be effective for treatment failure with 12-week SOF/VEL therapy.

Health-related quality of life in patients aged 6-18 years with chronic hepatitis C treated with sofosbuvir/velpatasvir.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: The aim of this study was to assess the effect of treatment with sofosbuvir/velpatasvir (SOF/VEL) on the health-related quality of life (HRQL) of children with chronic hepatitis C. METHODS: In the non-commercial, non-randomized, open-label PANDAA-PED study, 50 children aged 6-18 years with chronic hepatitis C were treated with a fixed dose of SOF/VEL. All patients achieved sustained virologic response 12 weeks after the end of treatment (SVR12). Evaluation of HRQL was performed twice: at baseline (before the treatment) and during the SVR12 analysis using the KIDSCREEN-27 questionnaires, which included 5 dimensions of HRQL, for child self-reporting and parent proxy reporting. The normal range for the population was set to T values of 50 ± 10 points. Child-parent agreement was analysed using the intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC) and Bland-Altman test. RESULTS: Mean T values were within the normal range for all dimensions, both before and after treatment. There was a significant improvement in physical well-being based on the children's self-assessment (from 48.53 to 51.21, p = .03). In addition, a trend towards better scores in the 'social support & peers' part of the parent proxy evaluation (from 45.98 to 48.66, p = .06) was noticed. After the treatment, the proportion of children self-assessing their physical well-being as below normal significantly decreased from 17% to 5% (p = .007). HRQL scores were not associated with patients' sex, but in most cases, younger age correlated with better HRQL. Evaluation of the ICC for child self-reports versus parent proxy reports revealed poor to moderate agreement for most single measures. Bland-Altman analysis showed that in all dimensions, both before and after treatment, the limits of agreement (LoAs) exceeded ±5 points (half of the SD and considered a maximum allowed difference). CONCLUSIONS: A significant proportion of children with chronic hepatitis C have decreased HRQL in all dimensions, but effective treatment with SOF/VEL leads to an improvement in some areas of well-being. As the effect of HCV on HRQL is more pronounced in older patients, treatment of younger children should be indicated to prevent them from experiencing decreased HRQL due to ongoing HCV infection in the future.

HepFREEPak: protocol for a multi-centre, prospective observational study examining efficacy and impact of current therapies for the treatment of hepatitis C in Pakistan and reporting resistance to antiviral drugs: study protocol.

BACKGROUND: Pakistan has one of the highest burdens of Hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection globally. To achieve the World Health Organization's goals for HCV elimination, there is a need for substantial scale-up in testing, treatment, and a reduction in new infections. Data on the population impact of scaling up treatment is not available in Pakistan, nor is there reliable data on the incidence of infection/reinfection. This project will fill this gap by providing important empirical data on the incidence of infection (primary and reinfection) in Pakistan. Then, by using this data in epidemic models, the study will determine whether response rates achieved with affordable therapies (sofosbuvir plus daclatasvir) will be sufficient to eliminate HCV in Pakistan. METHODS: This prospective multi-centre cohort study will screen 25,000 individuals for HCV antibody (Ab) and RNA (if Ab-positive) at various centers in Pakistan- Karachi (Sindh) and Punjab, providing estimates of the disease prevalence. HCV positive patients will be treated with sofosbuvir and daclatasvir for 12-weeks, (extended to 24-weeks in those with cirrhosis) and the proportion responding to this first-line treatment estimated. Patients who test HCV Ab negative will be recalled 12 months later to test for new HCV infections, providing estimates of the incidence rate. Patients diagnosed with HCV (~ 4,000) will be treated and tested for Sustained Virological Response (SVR). Questionnaires to assess risk factors, productivity, health care usage and quality of life will be completed at both the initial screening and at 12-month follow-up, allowing mathematical modelling and economic analysis to assess the current treatment strategies. Viral resistance will be analysed and patients who have successfully completed treatment will be retested 12 months later to estimate the rate of re-infection. CONCLUSION: The HepFREEPak study will provide evidence on the efficacy of available and widely used treatment options in Pakistan. It will also provide data on the incidence rate of primary infections and re-infections. Data on incidence risk factors will allow us to model and incorporate heterogeneity of risk and how that affects screening and treatment strategies. These data will identify any gaps in current test-and-treat programs to achieve HCV elimination in Pakistan. STUDY REGISTRATION: This study was registered on clinicaltrials.gov (NCT04943588) on June 29, 2021.

Ulcerative colitis coexisting with hepatitis C: A rare occurrence.

INTRODUCTION: We describe a rare case of a 54-year-old male diagnosed with both ulcerative colitis (UC) and hepatitis C virus (HCV), posing clinical challenges. PATIENT CONCERNS: The patient showed worsened UC symptoms, leading to further evaluations. DIAGNOSIS: Dual diagnosis of UC and HCV was confirmed through endoscopy and serological tests, ruling out other hepatic causes. Interventions: Treatment involved methylprednisolone for UC and sofosbuvir/velpatasvir for HCV, with attention to drug interactions. OUTCOMES: Significant improvement was observed in both UC symptoms and HCV viral load post-treatment. CONCLUSION: This case underscores the need for nuanced treatment in managing concurrent UC and HCV, considering potential drug interactions and disease impacts.

Identification and characterization of Sofosbuvir-resistant mutations of hepatitis C virus genotype 3a replicon.

Hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection is a major cause of chronic liver disease worldwide. Among its 8 genotypes (GT), GT3 has a relatively lower sustained virological response to highly effective direct-acting antiviral agents (DAA). Sofosbuvir (SOF), an anti-NS5B polymerase inhibitor, is a core component of many anti-HCV DAA cocktail regimens, and its resistant mutations are rare in clinics because these mutations usually severely impair the NS5B polymerase activity, including a mutation S282T in NS5B, the most frequently reported SOF-resistant mutation. In this study, we selected SOF-resistant variants of a previously developed GT3 subgenomic replicon (PR87A7). Two mutations were identified in the viral genome of SOF-resistant PR87A7 variants, Q606R in nontargeted NS3 and S282T in targeted N5SB. We demonstrated that Q606R could rescue the replication defect of S282T in PR87A7, and the resulting double mutant confers the SOF resistance. Finally, we showed that NS3-606R could not compensate for the replication defect of S282T in other GTs. In conclusion, we identified a novel GT3-specific combination of two mutations that confers SOF resistance. Our result calls for attention to potential mutations that may arise in nontargeted viral proteins during the SOF-based DAA treatment of chronic HCV.

Direct-Acting Antiviral Drug Modulates the Mitochondrial Biogenesis in Different Tissues of Young Female Rats.

(1) Background: Hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection is endemic in Egypt, with the highest prevalence rate worldwide. Sofosbuvir (SOF) is a nucleos(t)ide analog that specifically inhibits HCV replication. This study aimed to explore the possible effects of the therapeutic dose of SOF on the mitochondrial biogenesis and functions of the liver, muscle, and ovarian tissues of young normal female rats. (2) Methods: This study was conducted on 20 female Wistar rats, classified into two groups, the control group and the exposed group; the latter was orally supplemented with 4 mg/kg/day of SOF for 3 months. (3) Results: The exposure to SOF impairs mitochondrial biogenesis via mitochondrial DNA copy number decline and suppressed mitochondrial biogenesis-regulated parameters at mRNA and protein levels. Also, SOF suppresses the DNA polymerase γ (POLG) expression, citrate synthase activity, and mitochondrial NADH dehydrogenase subunit-5 (ND5) content, which impairs mitochondrial functions. SOF increased lipid peroxidation and oxidative DNA damage markers and decreased tissue expression of nuclear factor erythroid 2-related factor 2 (Nfe2l2). (4) Conclusions: The present findings demonstrate the adverse effects of SOF on mitochondrial biogenesis and function in different tissues of young female rats, which mostly appeared in ovarian tissues.

Does a detectable HCV RNA at the end of DAA therapy herald treatment failure?

BACKGROUND & AIMS: The study aimed to assess the phenomenon of achieving sustained virologic response (SVR) in patients with detectable ribonucleic acid (RNA) of hepatitis C virus (HCV) at the end of treatment (ET) with direct-acting antivirals (DAA), find how this is affected by the type of regimen, and how patients experiencing this differed from non-responders with detectable HCV RNA at the ET. METHODS: The study included all consecutive patients with detectable HCV RNA at the ET selected from the EpiTer-2 database, a retrospective national multicentre project evaluating antiviral treatment in HCV-infected patients in 2015-2023. RESULTS: Of the 16106 patients treated with IFN-free regimens with available HCV RNA assessment at the ET and at follow-up 12 weeks after treatment completion (FU), 1253 (7.8%) had detectable HCV RNA at the ET, and 1120 of them (89%) finally achieved SVR. This phenomenon was significantly more frequent in pangenotypic regimens, 10.3% vs. 4.7% in genotype-specific options (p < 0.001), and the highest proportion was documented for glecaprevir/pibrentasvir (13.7%), and velpatasvir/sofosbuvir ± ribavirin (6.9%). Patients ET + FU- treated with these two pangenotypic regimens (n = 668) had less advanced liver disease, were less frequently infected with genotype (GT) 3, and were significantly more likely to be treatment-naïve than 61 non-responders. CONCLUSIONS: We documented 7.8% rate of patients with detectable HCV RNA at the ET, of whom 89% subsequently achieved SVR, significantly more frequently in the population treated with pangenotypic regimens. Less severe liver disease, more often GT3 infection, and a higher percentage of treatment-naive patients distinguished this group from non-responders.

Usefulness Of Sofosbuvir And Daclatasvir Combination In The Treatment Of HCV Infection In Childhood Cancer Patients: Experience From A Tertiary Care Hospital.

Objectives: To determine the usefulness of Sofosbuvir-Daclatasvir combination in the treatment of hepatitis c virus infection in paediatric cancer.. METHODS: The retrospective study was conducted at the Oncology Department of the National Institute of Child Health, Karachi, and comprised medical charts of patients who received sofosbuvir and daclatasvir from January 2018 to January 2022. Efficacy was documented by clearance of hepatitis C virus ribonucleic acid as rapid viral response, early viral response and sustained viral response at weeks 4, 12 and 24, respectively. Drug efficacy was determined by monitoring and recording adverse effects. Chemotherapy protocol for the treatment of patients concomitantly receiving direct acting antivirals was modified while looking at drug-drug interactions. The total duration of direct acting antiviral therapy was 12 weeks. Data was analysed using SPSS 24. RESULTS: Of the 804 patients with different malignancies, 132(16.4%) were found positive for hepatitis C virus. Of them, 28(21.21%) patients were started on direct acting antivirals; 17(60.71%) boys and 11(39.28%) girls. The overall mean age was 9.93±6.12 years. The diagnosis was pre-B acute lymphoblastic leukaemia in 18(64.28%) cases, 16 (57.14%) were on maintenance chemotherapy, and 18(64.28%) had genotype 1. Pre- and post-treatment mean alanine transaminase levels were 328.00±324.00IU and 36.00±29.00IU, respectively (p=0.003). Pre- and post- treatment mean serum bilirubin levels were 3.13±3.95mg/dl and 0.61±0.21mg/dl (p=0.022). Rapid viral response was achieved in 26(92.85%) children, while early viral response and sustained viral response were achieved in all 28(100%) patients. Minor side effects were noted in 4(14.28%) patients and chemotherapy was continued in all 28(100%) cases as per the designed protocol. CONCLUSIONS: The sofosbuvir-daclatasvir combination was found to be effective in hepatitis C virus treatment in paediatric cancer patients.

Effectiveness of generic sofosbuvir in the treatment of chronic hepatitis C virus infection in Saudi patients.

OBJECTIVES: To assess the effectiveness of generic sofosbuvir (SOF) and branded daclatasvir (DCV) for the treatment of chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV)infected patients. METHODS: This retrospective study, performed in a single center in Saudi Arabia between August 2017 and July 2022, we enrolled 140 consecutive patients with HCV who received generic SOF and branded DCV. The primary outcome was sustained virologic response at week 12 (SVR12). RESULTS: The majority of the patients were female (62.1%), infected with genotype 4 (57.9%), and treatment-naïve in 120 (85.7%) patients with baseline cirrhosis in 55 (39.3%). The mean patient age was 61±13.6 years. In the intention-to-treat analysis, 131 (93.6%) patients achieved SVR12. Moreover, 85.7%, 100%, 100%, 88.9%, and 96.3% of genotypes 1a, 1b, 2, 3, and 4, respectively, achieved SVR12. In the per-protocol analysis, 131 (96.3%) patients achieved an SVR of 12. Additionally, 92.3%, 100%, 100%, 88.9%, and 98.7% of the patients with genotypes 1a, 1b, 2, 3, and 4, respectively, achieved SVR12. No HCV virologic breakthroughs occurred. In the subgroup analysis, SVR12 rates were comparable regardless of baseline characteristics, such as treatment history, cirrhosis, and hepatocellular carcinoma. Patients achieving SVR12 showed a significant improvement in post-treatment serum liver enzyme and total bilirubin levels. CONCLUSION: The findings of our study confirm the effectiveness of generic sofosbuvir as a treatment option for HCV infection.

Real-world value of direct-acting antivirals for hepatitis C at Kaiser Permanente Southern California.

OBJECTIVES: Direct-acting antivirals (DAAs) for chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) lead to cure in more than 95% of recipients; however, payers may limit access to these lifesaving drugs due to high initial cost. Here, the cost-effectiveness of treating HCV with DAAs vs no treatment over a lifetime horizon is evaluated from the perspective of Kaiser Permanente Southern California (KPSC). STUDY DESIGN: A hybrid decision-tree Markov model. METHODS: The model simulated the health and economic outcomes for a real cohort of patients with HCV treated with either ledipasvir-sofosbuvir or sofosbuvir-velpatasvir between November 1, 2014, and October 31, 2019, at KPSC. Patients entered the model at different stages of liver disease and received either active treatment with DAAs or no treatment. Patients who did not achieve sustained virological response experienced disease progression; those who achieved sustained virological response experienced either significantly slower or no disease progression depending on the stage of fibrosis at model start. Demographics, treatment experience, genotype, baseline fibrosis stage, treatment rates, and treatment efficacy were sourced from KPSC real-world data. Costs and utilities were sourced from published literature. RESULTS: A total of 7255 patients with a mean age of 59 years were treated during the study period. Over a lifetime horizon, DAAs resulted in significant reduction in advanced liver disease events and a total cost savings of $1 billion compared with no treatment based on a hybrid decision-tree Markov state-transition model. Cost savings were achieved after only 3 years. DAA intervention dominated no treatment on a per-patient and cohort basis. CONCLUSIONS: DAA treatment at KPSC is predicted to significantly reduce HCV-related morbidity and mortality, providing an anticipated return on investment in drug costs after 3 years of treatment.

Community-Based Point-of-Diagnosis Hepatitis C Treatment for Marginalized Populations: A Nonrandomized Controlled Trial.

Importance: Disparities persist in testing and treatment for hepatitis C virus (HCV), leaving socially marginalized populations less likely to benefit from curative treatment. Linkage services are often insufficient to overcome barriers to navigating the medical system and contextual factors. Objective: To determine the feasibility, acceptability, and safety of HCV treatment at the point of HCV infection diagnosis disclosure in a nonclinical community setting. Design, Setting, and Participants: In this single-arm nonrandomized controlled trial conducted between July 1, 2020, and October 31, 2021, street-outreach recruitment targeted people experiencing homelessness and injecting drugs in an urban US community who were eligible for simplified HCV treatment. Interventions: Study procedures were designed to reflect the community environment and services needed to provide HCV testing, disclosure, and treatment in a nonclinical site. The test-and-treat No One Waits (NOW) model of care provided a 2-week starter pack of 400 mg of sofosbuvir and 100 mg of velpatasvir at time of HCV RNA results disclosure. Participants were transitioned to insurance-provided sofosbuvir-velpatasvir when feasible to complete a 12-week treatment course. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary end point was sustained virologic response at posttreatment week 12 or later (SVR12). Acceptability end points were treatment initiation and completion. Safety end points were treatment discontinuation because of a late exclusion criterion and adverse events. Results: Of the 492 people (median [IQR] age, 48 [37-58] years; 62 [71%] male) who underwent anti-HCV testing, 246 (50%) tested anti-HCV positive, and 111 (23%) tested HCV RNA positive and were eligible for simplified HCV treatment. Eighty-nine of the 111 eligible participants (80%) returned for confirmatory RNA results, and 87 (98%) accepted and initiated HCV treatment. Seventy (80%) were currently injecting drugs, 83 (97%) had an income below the poverty line, and 53 (61%) were currently unsheltered. Most had HCV genotype 1a (45 [52%]) or 3 (20 [23%]). Sixty-nine (79%) completed 12 weeks of sofosbuvir-velpatasvir treatment, 2 stopped treatment because of low adherence, and 16 were lost to follow-up. Of the 66 participants who completed treatment and had a successful blood draw, 61 (92%) had undetectable HCV RNA at treatment completion. Of the 87 treated patients, 58 achieved SVR12, leading to a treatment response of 67% (95% CI, 56%-76%) among the intention-to-treat group and 84% (95% CI, 73%-92%) among the per-protocol group. There were no adverse events, late exclusions, or deaths. Conclusions and Relevance: In this nonrandomized controlled trial of HCV treatment at the point of diagnosis, the NOW model of care reduced steps between HCV testing and treatment initiation and resulted in high levels of treatment initiation, completion, and cure. The NOW model of care can expand the current HCV test-and-treat toolkit by reaching a broader population of marginalized communities and expediting curative therapy. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03987503.